![]() ![]() The bi-polar feature is important, because it adds contextual richness to the information. Thoughts are held as concepts, which are short “bi-polar” phrases. This is a method of creating a model of the world, which uses concepts and links. ![]() Their full meaning is gained from the connections to other thoughts.Ĭognitive mapping is based on a “Personal construct” theory (Kelly). The ideas in mind maps are short phrases, again designed to improve retention. Mind map “links” are usually passive though, not representing anything more than connectivity. The key to mind-mapping is that the map is a representation of information, ideas being connected to each other, which can help with retention and learning. They are however, different in some fundamental ways. Mind-Mapping ComparisonĪt first glance, the ‘cognitive mapping’ technique used by Decision Explorer® appears to be very similar to that known as ‘mind-mapping’. The second paper,” What’s in a Name?” is a comparison of the Cognitive mapping, mind mapping and concept mapping techniques. The first paper, here, is a Mind-Mapping Comparison, which compares the cognitive and mind mapping techniques. We have two articles comparing and contrasting different mapping techniques. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |